the gumbo pages

looka, <'lu-k&> dialect, v.
1. The imperative form of the verb "to look", in the spoken vernacular of New Orleans; usually employed when the speaker wishes to call one's attention to something.  

2. --n. Chuck Taggart's weblog, hand-made and updated (almost) daily, focusing on food and drink, music (especially of the roots variety), New Orleans and Louisiana culture, news of the reality-based community, movies, books, sf, public radio, media and culture, travel, Macs, liberal and progressive politics, humor and amusements, reviews, rants, the author's life and opinions, witty and/or smart-arsed comments and whatever else tickles the author's fancy.

Please feel free to contribute a link if you think I'll find it interesting.   If you don't want to read my opinions, feel free to go elsewhere.

Page last tweaked @ 9:04am PST, 10/31/2004

RSS Feed

If you like, you are welcome to send e-mail to the author. Your comments on each post are also welcome; however, right-wing trolls are about as welcome as a boil on my arse.
Search this site:


Now available!

"Doctors, Professors, Kings and Queens: The Big Ol' Box of New Orleans" is a 4-CD box set celebrating the joy and diversity of the New Orleans music scene, from R&B to jazz to funk to Latin to blues to zydeco to klezmer (!) and more, including a full-size, 80-page book.

Produced, compiled and annotated by Chuck Taggart (hey, that's me!), liner notes by Mary Herczog (author of Frommer's New Orleans) and myself. Now for sale at your favorite independent record stores, or order from Amazon.com.

Regime change for America, 2004.

Kick 'em out!

Two Faces

The Two Faces of Bush
Read more...

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

-- Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States (1901-1909), speaking in 1918

"There ought to be limits to freedom."

-- George W. Bush, May 21, 1999

"You don't get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier."

-- George W. Bush, describing what it's like to be governor of Texas, Governing Magazine, July 1998

"If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

-- George W. Bush, CNN.com, December 18, 2000

"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it."

-- George W. Bush, Business Week, July 30, 2001

Looka! Archive
(99 and 44/100% link rot)

September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004

2003:   Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec.

2002:   Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec.

2001:   Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec.

2000:   Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec.

1999:   Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec.
 

How to donate to this site:

Your donations help keep this site going. PayPal's the best way -- just click the button below, and thanks!

You can also donate via the Amazon.com Honor System, if you wish (but they deduct a larger fee from your donation and I keep less).

(Also, here's a shameless link to my Amazon Wish List.)

Buy stuff!

You can get Gumbo Pages designs on T-shirts, mugs and mousepads at The Gumbo Pages Swag Shop!

Friends with pages:

dule
ellen
jon
jordan
louie
mary katherine
nancy
pat and paul
peter
robb
sean
shel
steve
ted
todd
tracy and david

Talking furniture:

KCSN (Los Angeles)
   Broadcast schedule
   "Down Home" playlist
   Live MP3 audio stream

   Subscribe to the
   "Down Home" weekly
   playlist email service

WWOZ (New Orleans)
   Broadcast schedule
   Live audio stream

PublicRadioFan.com
   (Comprehensive listings)

Air America Radio
   (Talk radio for the
   rest of us)
Folkscene
Joe Frank
Grateful Dead Radio
   (Streaming complete
   shows!)
KPIG, 107 Oink 5
   (Freedom, CA)
KRVS Radio Acadie
   (Lafayette, LA)
LouisianaRadio.com
Mike Hodel's "Hour 25"
   (Science fiction radio)
Radio Free New Orleans
Raidió na Gaeltachta
   (Irish language)
RootsWorld's Rootsradio
RTÉ Radio Ceolnet
   (Irish trad. music)
WXDU (Durham, NC)

Cocktail hour:

CocktailDB
   The Internet's most comprehensive
   and indispensible database of
   authenticated cocktail recipes,
   ingredients, reseearch and more.
   By Martin Doudoroff & Ted Haigh)

*     *     *
The Sazerac Cocktail
   (The sine qua non of cocktails,
   and the quintessential New Orleans
   cocktail. Learn to make it.)

The Footloose Cocktail
   (An original by Wes;
   "Wonderful!" - Gary Regan.
   "Very elegant, supremely
   sophisticated" - Daniel Reichert.)


The Hoskins Cocktail
   (An original by Chuck;
   "It's nothing short of a
   masterpiece." - Gary Regan)


Chuck & Wes' Cocktail Menu
   (A few things we like to
   drink at home, plus a couple
   we don't, just for fun.)


*     *     *

The Alchemist
   (Paul Harrington)

Alcohol (and how to mix it)
   (David Wondrich)

Ardent Spirits
   (Gary & Mardee Regan)

DrinkBoy and the
   Community for the
   Cultured Cocktail
   (Robert Hess, et al.)

DrinkBoy's Cocktail Weblog

Happy Hours
   (Beverage industry
   news & insider info)

King Cocktail
   (Dale DeGroff)

La Fée Verte
   (All about absinthe
   from Kallisti et al.)

LUPEC.org
   (Ladies United for the
   Preservation of
   Endangered Cocktails)

Fine Spirits & Cocktails
   (eGullet's forum)

Mr. Lucky's Cocktails
   (Sando, LaDove,
   Swanky et al.)

Nat Decants
   (Natalie MacLean)

Tastings.com
   (Beverage Tasting
   Institute journal)

Vintage Cocktails
   (Daniel Reichert)

Let's eat!

New Orleans Menu Daily

Food-related weblogs:
Appetites
Chocolate and Zucchini
Honest Cuisine
KIPlog's FOODblog
MeatHenge
Mise en Place
Notes from a New Orleans Foodie
Sauté Wednesday
Simmer Stock
Tasting Menu

More food!
à la carte
Chef Talk Café
Chowhound
eGullet
Epicurious
Food Network
The Global Gourmet
A Muse for Cooks
The Online Chef
Pasta, Risotto & You
Slow Food Int'l. Movement
So. Calif. Farmer's Markets
Zagat Guide
&c.

Click here for a new daily recipe from Chef Emeril!
In vino veritas.

The Oxford Companion to Wine

Wally's Wine and Spirits

The Wine House

wines.com

The Wine Spectator

Wine Today

Reading this month:

The Plot Against America, by Philip Roth.

The Dark Tower, by Stephen King.

The Cat's Pajamas, by Ray Bradbury.

Microcosmic God: The Complete Stories of Theodore Sturgeon, Vol. 2, by Theodore Sturgeon.

Shade, by Neil Jordan.

Listen to music!

Chuck's current album recommendations

Altan
BeauSoleil
Beck
Luka Bloom
La Bottine Souriante
Billy Bragg
Cordelia's Dad
Jay Farrar
Kíla
Sonny Landreth
Los Lobos
Christy Moore
Nickel Creek
The Old 97s
Anders Osborne
Planxty
The Proclaimers
Professor Longhair
Red Meat
The Red Stick Ramblers
The Reivers
Zachary Richard
Paul Sanchez
Marc Savoy
Son Volt
Spink
Richard Thompson
Uncle Tupelo
Wilco

Miles of Music

No Depression

RootsWorld

New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival

San Francisco Celtic Music & Arts Festival

Appalachian String Band Music Festival - Clifftop, WV

Long Beach Bayou Festival

Strawberry Music Festival - Yosemite, CA

Photography:

A Gallery for Fine Photography, New Orleans (Joshua Mann Pailet)
American Museum of Photography
California Museum of Photography, Riverside
International Center of Photography

Ansel Adams
Jonathan Fish
Noah Grey
Greg Guirard
Paul F. R. Hamilton
Clarence John Laughlin
Herman Leonard
Howard Roffman
J. T. Seaton
Jerry Uelsmann
Gareth Watkins
Brett Weston

The Mirror Project


Chuck's Photo of the Day Archive

Comix:

The Amazing Adventures of Bill,
by Bill Roundy

Bloom County / Outland / Opus,
by Berkeley Breathed

Bob the Angry Flower,
by Stephen Notley

The Boondocks,
by Aaron McGruder

Calvin and Hobbes,
by Bill Watterson

Doonesbury,
by Garry B. Trudeau

Electric Sheep Comix
by Patrick Farley

Get Your War On
by David Rees

Goats
by Jonathan Rosenberg

L. A. Cucaracha
by Lalo Alcaraz

Leviathan,
by Peter Blegvad

Lil' Abner,
by Al Capp

The Mostly Unfabulous Social Life of Ethan Green,
by Eric Orner

Pogo,
by Walt Kelly

Ted Rall,
by Ted Rall

This Modern World,
by Tom Tomorrow

XQUZYPHYR & Overboard,
by August J. Pollak

Films seen this year:
(with ratings):

Cold Mountain (****)
The Last Samurai (****)

DVDfile.com

Lookin' at da TV:

"The Sopranos"
"Six Feet Under"
"Malcolm In The Middle"
"Star Trek: Enterprise"
"ER"
"Smallville"
"One Tree Hill"
"Queer Eye for the Straight Guy"
"The Simpsons"
"Deadwood"
Father Ted
"Iron Chef"
The Food Network

tvpicks.net

Weblogs I read:

AmericaBlog
American Leftist
BoingBoing
The BradLands
CamWorld
Cardhouse
The Carpetbagger Report
Cheesedip
Considered Harmful
Crabwalk
The Daily Kos
Anil Dash
Electrolite
Eschaton
Ethel the Blog
Follow Me Here
Franklin Avenue
Ghost in the Machine
Goluboy
Hit or Miss
The Hoopla 500
Jesus' General
Mark A. R. Kleiman
kottke.org
The Leaky Cauldron
Letting Loose With the Leptard
Little. Yellow. Different.
Making Light
Medley
memepool
Misnomer
MonkeyFist
More Like This
Mr. Barrett
Neil Gaiman's Journal
News of the Dead
NowThis.com
August J. Pollak
Q Daily News
Real Live Preacher
Respectful of Otters
Right Hand Thief
Roger "Not That One" Ailes
Ted Rall
Sadly, No!
This Modern World
Under the Gunn
WendellWit.com
Whiskey Bar
What's In Rebecca's Pocket?
Windowseat

Matthew's GLB blog portal

L.A. Blogs

My Darlin' New Orleans:

Gambit Weekly
NOLA.com
OffBeat


NOLAblogs

New Orleans ...
proud to blog it home.

Must-reads:

AlterNet.org (progressive politics & news)
Borowitz Report (political satire)
The Complete Bushisms (quotationable!)
The Daily Mislead (BushCo's lies)
The Fray (your stories)
Izzle Pfaff! (my favorite webjournal)
Landover Baptist (better Christians than YOU!)
Maledicta (The International Journal of Verbal Aggression)
The Morning Fix from SF Gate (news, opinions, extreme irreverence)
The New York Review of Science Fiction
The Onion (news 'n laffs)
"Rush, Newspeak and Fascism: An exegesis", by David Neiwert.
Talking Points Memo (Josh Marshall)
TruthOut (William Rivers Pitt & Co.)
Whitehouse.org (not the actual White House, but it should be)

The Final Frontier:

Astronomy Pic of the Day
ISS Alpha News
NASA Human Spaceflight
Spaceflight Now

SF:

Locus Magazine Online
SF Site
SFWA

Made with Macintosh

Hosted by pair Networks

Déanta:  This page is coded by hand, with BBEdit 4.0.1 on an Apple G4 15" PowerBook running MacOS X 10.3 if I'm at home; occasionally with telnet and Pico on a FreeBSD Unix host running tcsh if I'm updating from work. (I never could get used to all those weblogging tools.)

LOOKA!


Bia agus deoch, ceol agus craic.

  Sunday, October 31, 2004
 
Sucking democracy dry.   Last week's Village Voice commissioned a powerful image for their lead story last week, created by Alex Ross. I couldn't think of a scarier Hallowe'en image if I tried all night:

Bush, sucking democracy dry

Nine extremely important reasons to vote for John Kerry.   Via Bob Harris, who says, "Make no mistake: we are likely about to decide the balance of the Supreme Court for a generation."

The Supreme Court
Salon reports that, despite most media accounts, Rehnquist may be gravely ill:

Numerous medical studies only mention tracheotomy -- in which surgeons cut a hole into a patient's windpipe to aid breathing -- as a treatment for a rare form of thyroid cancer called anaplastic carcinoma. According to the University of Virginia Health Center, "anaplastic carcinoma is an extremely serious and aggressive thyroid cancer which often results in the death of the patient ... within several months of diagnosis."
And from the Los Angeles Times:

The most dangerous form is anaplastic... "one of the most malignant types of cancer known to humans," said Dr. Yuri Nikiforov, a pathologist and thyroid expert at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine... Fatality rates top 95 percent in the first year after diagnosis...

A tracheotomy indicates that the tumor threatened to obstruct Rehnquist's windpipe, and that the tumor is fast-growing, according to several outside thyroid specialists. "At his age, having had a tracheotomy, the first thing that comes to mind is... anaplastic thyroid cancer," said Dr. Peter Singer, chief of clinical endocrinology at USC's Keck School of Medicine.

John Paul Stevens, age 84.  Cancer survivor.
William Rehnquist, age 80.  Currently hospitalized for thyroid cancer.
Sandra Day O'Connor, age 74.  Cancer survivor.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg, age 71.  Cancer survivor.
Antonin Scalia, age 68
Anthony Kennedy, age 68
Stephen Breyer, age 66
David Souter, age 65
Clarence Thomas, age 56

Only Thomas is below conventional retirement age. And while Bush has played coy about whom he would appoint, his record is clear.

Charles Pickering, for example, has been consistently hostile to civil rights and voting rights issues while siding with cross-burners (literally) and advocating increased enforcement of Mississippi's laws making interracial marriage a crime.

Bush announced his appointment, in defiance of Congress while they were recessed, on the Martin Luther King holiday weekend.

Bush's other recess appointment that weekend was Alabama's William Pryor, who has called Roe v. Wade "the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history" -- even when pressed to consider the Plessy v. Ferguson separate-but-equal ruling or the Dred Scott black-have-no-rights-at-all decision.

Spend a little time researching Pickering and Pryor. Please don't take my word for it. Google around. See what Bush really considers important in his judges.

And don't lose sight of the wink-at-his-base symbolism involved: Bush appointed these two horrific nutjobs... on the Martin Luther King holiday weekend. You can almost hear him snickering.

Fortunately, because Pickering and Pryor were end-run recess appointments, they expire at the end of the year. We're not stuck with them forever... yet.

Giving George W. Bush another shot at one, two, or three seats on this court would change the course of civil rights, voting rights, women's rights, and every issue most Americans dear for a generation.

It's not just Roe v. Wade. Justices like Scalia and Thomas, the two Bush has described as his favorites, don't even believe in our right of privacy in our own homes, in our own bedrooms. A majority consisting of their ilk would set this country back fifty or more years in terms of progress in rights in civil liberties. The negative effects of George Bush's potential appointments to the Court could last two generations or more.

He must not be returned to the presidency.

Quotes of the day.   Via Billmon, the face of American (would-be) fascism.

Lisa Dupler, a 33-year-old from Columbus, held up a rainbow-striped John Kerry sign outside the Nationwide Arena on Friday, as Republicans streamed out after being rallied by George W. Bush and Arnold Schwarzenegger. A thickset woman with very short, dark hair, Dupler was silent and barely flinched as people passing her hissed "faggot" into her ear. An old lady looked at her and said, "You people are sick!" A kid who looked to be about 10 or 11 affected a limp wrist and mincing voice and said, "Oh, I'm gay." Rather than restraining him, his squat mother guffawed and then turned to Dupler and sneered, "Why don't you go marry your girlfriend?" Encouraged, her son yelled, "We don't want faggots in the White House!"

The throngs of Republicans were pumped after seeing the president and the action hero. But there was an angry edge to their elation. They shrieked at the dozen or so protesters standing on the concrete plaza outside the auditorium. "Kerry's a terrorist!" yelled a stocky kid in baggy jeans and braces. "Communists for Kerry! Go back to Russia," someone else screamed. Many of them took up the chant "Kerry sucks"; old women and teenage boys shouting with equal ferocity.

With four days to go until the election, you can feel the temperature rising in Ohio.

-- From Michelle Goldberg's article "Down with the Kerry haters", Salon, October 30, 2004.

Hatred, Hitler had recognized, was among the most powerful of emotions. That was what he consciously appealed to. That is what drove so many of his followers. But there was idealism, too -- misplaced, certainly, but idealism none the less: hopes of a new society, of a 'national community' that would transcend all existing social divides . . . Those who did not belong to in the 'national community' -- 'shirkers', 'spongers', 'parasites', and, of course, those deemed not to be German at all, notably Jews -- would be ruthlessly suppressed.

-- Ian Kershaw, Hitler, 1998

[ Link to today's entries ]

  Saturday, October 30, 2004
 
"This American Life" on voter suppression and fraud, almost entirely by Republicans. The report by Jack Hitt was posted early, and is 14 minutes, 53 seconds long. Listen to it.

Bush, Ashcroft seek limits to suits over voter fraud.   This is their idea of American democracy -- allow rampant Republican-led voter fraud and suppression, then attempt to limit it in legally unprecedented moves. Bastards.

Bush administration lawyers argued in three closely contested states last week that only the Justice Department, and not voters themselves, may sue to enforce the voting rights set out in the Help America Vote Act, which was passed in the aftermath of the disputed 2000 election.

Veteran voting-rights lawyers expressed surprise at the government's action, saying that closing the courthouse door to aspiring voters would reverse decades of precedent.

Since the civil rights era of the 1960s, individuals have gone to federal court to enforce their right to vote, often with the support of groups such as the NAACP, the AFL-CIO, the League of Women Voters or the state parties. And until now, the Justice Department and the Supreme Court had taken the view that individual voters could sue to enforce federal election law.

But in legal briefs filed in connection with cases in Ohio, Michigan and Florida, the administration's lawyers argue that the new law gives Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft the exclusive power to bring lawsuits to enforce its provisions. These include a requirement that states provide "uniform and nondiscriminatory" voting systems, and give provisional ballots to those who say they have registered but whose names do not appear on the rolls.

"Congress clearly did not intend to create a right enforceable" in court by individual voters, the Justice Department briefs said.

In one case the Sandusky County Democratic Party sued Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, arguing that the county's voters should be permitted to file provisional ballots even if they go to the wrong polling place on election day.

The Justice Department intervened as a friend of the court on Blackwell's side.

And does anyone but GOP heel-clickers think that Ashcroft will bring a single voter fraud related lawsuit directed at what his party has been doing?

Ohio says no to GOP voter suppression efforts.   Kos put it best when he said, "Republicans seek to decrease voter turnout, Democrats seek to increase it." The thoroughly vile actions of the Republicans to decrease voter turnout and challenge voters in Ohio is beginning to backfire on them, and I hope this rejection of their anti-American practices builds up speed and momentum until we see some of them in jail.

When Catherine Herold received mail from the Ohio Republican Party earlier this year, she refused it.

The longtime Barberton Democrat wanted no part of the mailing and figured that by refusing it, the GOP would have to pay the return postage.

What she didn't count on was the returned mail being used to challenge the validity of her voter registration.

Herold, who is assistant to the senior vice president and provost at the University of Akron, was one of 976 Summit County voters whose registrations were challenged last week by local Republicans on behalf of the state party.

She went to the Board of Elections on Thursday morning to defend her right to vote and found herself among an angry mob -- people who had to take time off work to defend their right to vote.

After hearing some of the protests, the board voted unanimously to dismiss all 976 challenges.

[...] In addition to dismissing the challenges, the elections board ordered that none of those voters whose registrations were called into question could be challenged again at the polls.

[...] The challengers, all older longtime Republicans -- Barbara Miller, Howard Calhoun, Madge Doerler and Louis Wray -- were subpoenaed by the elections board and were present at the hearings. Akron attorney Jack Morrison, a Republican, volunteered to represent the four.

Democratic board member Russ Pry suggested that the four could be subject to criminal prosecution for essentially making false claims on the challenge forms. The form states that making a false claim is subject to prosecution as a fifth-degree felony.

On Morrison's advice, Miller then refused to take part in any hearings after Herold's, invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Wray filed a challenge against 25-year-old Barbara Jean DeWilde of Stow, but testified that he had no personal knowledge that DeWilde didn't live at her Stow address, other than information he received from Summit County Republican Party headquarters.

DeWilde called the challenge "a mockery of America's free election process."

[...] The angry voters had the Republicans on the defensive.

"Why'd you do it?" one challenged voter shouted out at Calhoun. "Who the hell are you?" the man asked.

"What the hell do you care?" replied Calhoun, an attorney.

Jesus Christ.

Despite the worst efforts of these bastards, the voters will rule, and the votes will be counted. Get out there and vote on Tuesday, as if your freedom depended on it (because it does).

"The Bush Pledge", for feck's sake?   Josh Marshall reports:

Chris Suellentrop [in Slate]has a half bizarre/half chilling report from the campaign trail in Florida last night. It's about what seems to be a new feature of the Bush rallies: the pledge of allegiance to President Bush.

Here's Chris ...

"I want you to stand, raise your right hands," and recite "the Bush Pledge," said Florida state Sen. Ken Pruitt. The assembled mass of about 2,000 in this Treasure Coast town about an hour north of West Palm Beach dutifully rose, arms aloft, and repeated after Pruitt: "I care about freedom and liberty. I care about my family. I care about my country. Because I care, I promise to work hard to re-elect, re-elect George W. Bush as president of the United States."

I know the Bush-Cheney campaign occasionally requires the people who attend its events to sign loyalty oaths, but this was the first time I have ever seen an audience actually stand and utter one. Maybe they've replaced the written oath with a verbal one.

I believe in one father, one son and one other son, who's now governor of Florida, who will take over after this son retires from office in 2009.

I know I'm dooming myself by invoking Godwin's Law, but I swear to God the first thing I thought of when I read this was German troops on the eve of World War II, reciting en masse their loyalty oath to You Know Who (not Voldemort).

UPDATE: Whew ... it wasn't just me who made that connection. So did Billmon, back again from blogging retirement; here's what he said:

All officers of the SS were required to take the loyalty oath. Raising their right hand and their left hand placed on their officers sword, the oath went as follows: "I swear to thee, Adolph Hitler as Fuhrer and chancellor of the German Reich, my Loyalty and Bravery. I vow to thee and the superiors whom those shall appoint, obedience until death, so help me God."
-- Jim Harris, World War II Stories: In Their Own Words

Sure, only here they'll call it anti-fascism.
-- Huey Long, when asked if fascism could ever come to America

Last summer, not very long before I quit blogging, I wrote about an incident in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, in which some local Republicans decided it would be great fun to have a couple of companies from the local Army base attend a Bush campaign rally, in unit formation, wearing special t-shirts emblazoned with the American flag and bearing the label "I am an American soldier" on the back. The fort's commander, one Col. Danny Nobles, did his troops one better: He showed up at the rally in full uniform.

Now as I pointed out at the time, history is filled with examples of bad things that happened because the military of a powerful state decided to dabble in partisan politics -- which is why the code of military justice generally frowns on stunts like the LaCrosse rally. Authoritarian political movements, like trees, from tiny acorns may grow:

If the t-shirt design catches on, then some other party hack might well develop a proprietary patriotic logo -- something distinctly identifiable as a Republican Party symbol -- to go on those t-shirts. (With their "I am an American soldier" slogan, the LaCrosse GOP is half way there already.)

Having the troops all wear arm bands with the new party logo on them would also look kind of cool.

But standing around in the sun waiting for the leader to appear can be hot work, so it wouldn't be too surprising if some local GOP chapters started giving the soldiers baseball caps with that patriotic party logo on the front.

And since you now have all these splendid young hunks standing around in their snazzy party outfits, and since their drill sergeants are also on hand, why not do something fun to entertain the crowd -- like having the troops parade in formation past the leader on his podium. What would be the harm in that?

And if the troops are going to parade, why not have them salute? Of course, using the standard military salute might be a little obvious. So why not create a new party salute -- like, say, banging a clenched fist on the heart, or, better yet, extending a stiffened right arm, fingers pointed towards the leader in a gesture of obedience and respect.

Imagine the effect it would have on the crowd -- all those handsome young heros, marching in perfect lockstep, showing their loyalty to their commander in chief. And if the leader were to give the party salute back, expressing his dedication to the sacred cause of defending the homeland ...

Hah! Let's see the Democrats try to compete with that!

And now we have local GOP Gauleiters in Florida soliciting oaths of allegiance not to the flag, not to the country, not to the constitution, but to the person of the leader -- albeit still an elected one, at least for now.

One people, one country, one leader ...

One step following another.

The truly sinister thing -- and the reason why that Slate story made the hair stand up on the back of my neck -- is that even as these people move, like sleepwalkers, towards a distinctly American version of the cult of the leader, most of them honestly appear to have no idea what they're doing, or creating. I'm not even sure the Rovians themselves entirely understand the atavistic instincts they've awakened in Bush's most loyal followers. But the current is running now, fast and strong. And we're all heading for the rapids.

John Kerry for President.

LA Weekly: John Kerry and John Edwards for President and Vice-President.   Endorsements don't get any more essential and plain-spoken than this:

With the possible exception of Jefferson Davis, and for some of the same reasons, George W. Bush is the most dangerous president our continent has known. Like Davis, Bush has amassed a stunningly divisive, parochial and belligerent record. In an era demanding international coordination simply to ensure a decent defense against terrorists, Bush is a militaristic xenophobe (and a careless one at that, as our troops in Iraq discover on a daily basis). At a time when corporations are abandoning the wage-and-benefit practices that once made American workers the envy of the world, Bush wants government to abandon its own responsibility to our citizens, leaving Americans to their own inadequate devices to pay for health care, college, retirement and other such incidentals. Just as a mental exercise, try imagining a worse president than this cosseted brat. It ain't easy.

John Kerry is a Democrat in the center-left mainstream of the party, who's led significant battles on behalf of environmental and energy causes, and who would re-assert government's role in enabling Americans to receive health coverage, college educations and union representation. By any measure a more credible commander in chief than Bush, Kerry knows that an America that stands only for military force and that undermines its own best values in so doing has the moral and political firepower of a pop gun. The Massachusetts senator believes in civil liberties and a woman's right to choose -- beliefs his Supreme Court appointees would share, as George W. Bush's would not. Kerry may not be the ideal liberal candidate (none such exists this year), but he has the makings of a more-than-decent president, and his victory would enable liberal groups to move from defense to offense.

George W. Bush is a threat to the republic and the planet. The only way to stop him is to vote for John Kerry, a course the Weekly recommends more fervently than any endorsement we have ever made.

Speaking of You Know Who ...   (Not ... er, Rudolf Hilter.) This t-shirt Republicans for Voldemort has been a huge hit with just about everyone I know, and most of them have wanted one for themselves as well. Buy your own here! Bumper stickers, too. (And check out the comic strip "Goats" while you're at it.)

Actually, the first time I wore it to work I got some very strange looks, either from people who didn't know who Voldemort is, or from people who looked at me and thought, "He's a Republican?!" (Hee hee.)

Ah well ... as Irish singer, lyricist, playwright and novelist Julian Gough once said, "A day without a strange look is a day wasted."

[ Link to today's entries ]

  Friday, October 29, 2004
 
Our first review!   Shameless ego-boo, I know ... I was wondering whether I should post this at all, thinking it perhaps too conceited and the ego-boo too shameless. Then Mary said, "Sweetheart, you have a weblog. Such a thing is ontologically prone to shameless ego-boo. Post this." Okay, posting away! (She is the co-author of our box set book, after all, and let's face it -- we wanna sell some records here.)

Here's our first review (that I was able to find, at least) of Doctors, Professors, Kings and Queens, written by Buddy Blue in yesterday's San Diego Union-Tribune:

[Y]ou know what the best part of this job is? I get an endless supply of free stuff, more than I can even deal with, stuff you have to pay for. The pleasure of casually dumping evil crapola as publicists beg for a line or two in this little column is only exceeded by the bliss to be gleaned from receiving freebies so wonderful, you can see the jealousy in the eyes of your friends as they feverishly, enviously rifle though your stash of promo goods. Right, Rolle? Gina? Bwahh-haw-haww, I say!

This week, I received the year's single most awesome package, and my amigos hate me even more than usual. Allow me to share, as this, after all, is what I'm paid to do:

"Doctors, Professors, Kings & Queens: The Big Ol' Box of New Orleans" (Shout! Factory). If you only pick up one boxed set this year, make it this'un -- a perfectly realized, four-disc primer of Crescent City ear candy.

The set encompasses everything from the patriarchs of jass (Louis Armstrong, Kid Ory, Jelly Roll Morton) to the heavies of the blues (Snooks Eaglin, Earl King, Walter "Wolfman" Washington), from the founding fathers of rock 'n' roll (Fats Domino, Little Richard, Lloyd Price) to the golden age of N'Awlins vocal R&B (Johnny Adams, Aaron Neville, Ernie K-Doe), from the masters whose sway continues to touch the world (Professor Longhair, Dr. John, Clifton Chenier) to the lesser-known lights who have long warranted wider recognition (James Booker, Boozoo Chavis, Dave Bartholomew).

The scope of this project transcends the classic, though; a playlist of contemporary artists, some so obscure as to be making their national debut, exists side-by-side with the greats and pioneers. Modern highlights include tracks from James Armstrong [sic], Sonny Landreth, Henry Butler, Dirty Dozen Brass Band and, well ... too many others to name here.

At first, I found the spastic chronology jarring, then I recognized it as a strength instead; play the set in sequence and you'll soon forget that as much as 60 years separate back-to-back tracks - it's all primo, organic, smokin', happy-feets swamp music, and as such, equal-opportunity party-tinder of the highest order.

As if the sides themselves weren't wonderful enough on their own merit, the set contains an 80-page book (not a booklet) constructed very much in the maverick spirit of the music itself. Historic and contemporary photos and art; impressionistic liner notes rife with regional color and humor; reproductions of local signage; and several amusing lists ("Things to Do in New Orleans That Are Totally Uncool and Are Usually Done by Tourists and Drunk Conventioneers but Are Actually Quite Fun") complement the detailed recording data.

Truth be told, New Orleans may be the only city in the world boasting a musical-cultural legacy as rich and healthy in modern times as it was in decades past, which is precisely why this set works so seamlessly on every level. With almost 100 years of recorded bon ton roulet behind it, may New Orleans continue its productive ways to the degree that a similar package of 21st-century wonderfulness be released in 2104!

Thank you, Buddy, for the lovely review. I think Buddy meant James Andrews rather than "James Armstrong." That's okay; he's certainly a musical and spiritual descendent of Louis, if not a literal one.

Twin Cities news crew may have videotaped Iraq explosives.   Looks like we've finally got the proof.

A 5 Eyewitness News crew in Iraq shortly after the fall of Saddam Hussein was in the area where tons of explosives disappeared, and may have videotaped some of those weapons.

The missing explosives are now an issue in the presidential debate. Democratic candidate John Kerry is accusing President Bush of not securing the site they allegedly disappeared from. President Bush says no one knows if the ammunition was taken before or after the fall of Baghdad on April 9, 2003 when coalition troops moved in to the area.

Using GPS technology and talking with members of the 101st Airborne Division, 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS has determined the crew embedded with the troops may have been on the southern edge of the Al Qaqaa installation, where the ammunition disappeared. The news crew was based just south of Al Qaqaa, and drove two or three miles north of there with soldiers on April 18, 2003.

During that trip, members of the 101st Airborne Division showed the 5 Eyewitness News news crew bunker after bunker of material labelled "explosives." Usually it took just the snap of a bolt cutter to get into the bunkers and see the material identified by the 101st as detonation cords.

"We can stick [some fuses] in those and make some good bombs." a soldier told our crew.

UPDATE via Kos: "David Kay, [former] Iraq weapons inspector for the Bush Administration, just appeared on CNN and was asked by Aaron Brown to review the new video filmed on April 18, 2003, one month after the invasion and 8 days after US Troops first arrived at Al Qaqaa.

He was asked about the video which shows the seal. He said that they are indeed IAEA seals and he's seen nothing else like them in IRAQ. He then went on to say that only the explosives in question would have been sealed because of their potency. He then said that other parts of the video show clearly that these were the types of explosives in question.

He was asked if it was "Game, Set, Match". He replied yes, "Game, Set, Match".

In a final blow to recent conservative spin he was asked if they were classified as WMD. He replied point blank, "Absolutely not."

Josh Marshall has the best coverage of this story. Start at the link and keep reading.

I think BushCo is out of spin for this one.

Osama bin Remembered-just-now.   Ooh, a new Osama video. Boooooo, oooooooo, scary kids! Owwwoooooooooo! Think he's trying to affect the election, maybe, do ya?! Billmon says, "Right on time, too -- four days before the election. (The Madrid bombing was three days before.)"

If anyone had any doubts about which candidate al-Qaeda prefers in this election, I think you can put them to rest now. This tape -- coming hard on the heels of "Azzam the American" -- is obviously designed to have U.S. voters as obsessively worried about the terrorist threat as possible when they go into the voting booth next Tuesday. Osama, like Bush, understands the electoral value of zapping the deeper reptilian centers of the brain. Call it hypothalamus politics. Or, as one member of the media idiot chorus cheerfully told CNN a few days ago: "Fear works."

In a way, this move is even smarter than an actual terrorist attack on American soil -- which al-Qaeda might not have been able to pull off anyway. A real attack would have been an unpredictable gamble. It might have given Bush a huge boost, but it's at least conceivable it would have had the opposite effect, by underscoring the hollowness of the endlessly repeated Republican claim that our cowboy-in-chief has made us all safer.

Osama's video bomb, on the other hand, is a brilliant example of "virtual" terrorism. It's perfectly designed to keep the media tape loop spinning from now until next Tuesday, with minimal risk of a backlash. It not only wipes the missing explosives story off the map (that is, until they do the same to some unsuspecting Americans) it also allows the GOP to turn every remaining campaign event into a bin Laden hate rally. It is, in short, the definitive October surprise.

What was it Rove said the other day when Sean Hannity asked him about October surprises? "We've got a couple of things we intend to spring." Something like that.

Best not to go there. I'm paranoid enough as it is.

John Kerry could, and probably will, use the Osama tape to remind the country that, three years and two wars later, the king of the evildoers, the man Sheriff Bush vowed to smoke out of his hole, is still roaming around free somewhere. Maybe the Democrats can recycle that ad they made after the third debate (the one the media ignored because they were still so deeply offended by Kerry's Mary-Cheney-is-a-lesbian gaffe) in which President denied having denied that he was worried about bin Laden's next move.

It's worth a try, anyway. But I don't think rational arguments are going to be of much use here. Osama's no slouch at information warfare. I'm sure he understands that the impact of a tape like this one on the mass mind is mainly subliminal, if not hormonal. By plastering his face over every TV in America for the next couple of days, he's given Bush a priceless gift -- a boogeyman with which to frighten that last sliver of undecided voters into rejecting change. Al Qaeda, it seems, has evolved into one hell of an effective 527 organization.

I'm not worried, and don't you be either. This is the same unspecific threatening blather we've kept hearing from OBL for the last three years. If anything, it should remind the American people that Bush failed to catch bin Laden, and he's still out there making threats.

Atrios: "Well, he's still out there. Nice job with the whole 'dead or alive' thing."

Paul Begala: "Mr. Dyke, the president famously promised us, you and me, all the American people, that he would get Osama bin Laden -- and I'm quoting him here -- 'dead or alive.' Which did he get him, dead or alive?" (On CNN's "Crossfire", to Republican apparatchik Jim Dyke)

NASA photo analyst: Bush wore device during debate.   Salon reports that Dr. Robert M. Nelson, a senior research scientist for NASA and for Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, an international authority on image analysis, a professional physicist and photo analyst for over 30 years says, "I am willing to stake my scientific reputation to the statement that Bush was wearing something under his jacket during the debate ... This is not about a bad suit. And there's no way the bulge can be described as a wrinkled shirt."

Protect your vote!   The good folks at MoveOn.org offer a voters' rights guide to help you be aware and prepared in case anyone attempts to interfere with your right to vote on Tuesday. Read this, print it out, and print out their wallet-sized voter rights card. This is important.

They're doing it again. In Nevada, a Republican contractor has allegedly ripped up thousands of Democratic registration forms. In Florida, Jeb Bush has purged tens of thousands of legitimate voters -- mostly black, mostly Democratic -- from the rolls because their names are similar to a felon's.(Greg Palast, Harper's Magazine, October 2004). In Ohio, the Republican Secretary of State has been so uncooperative that a federal judge said that he "apparently seeks to accomplish the same result in Ohio in 2004 that occurred in Florida in 2000."

But there's one big difference between the election of 2000 and the election of 2004: this time, a number of powerful, well-staffed groups will be aggressively responding to each and every instance of voter intimidation, suppression, and fraud. Messing with our right to vote is a felony, and with your help we'll make sure that anyone who does is prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

We've put together a wallet-sized card that has all the numbers and information you need if someone tries to stop you from exercising your right to vote. You can download it here (requires Adobe Acrobat software to load.)

In a great majority of polling places, of course, voting will be very efficient -- even fun. Poll workers will guide you through the process. They're non-partisan,and they are there to help.

But it's likely that some precincts will be targeted for vote suppression, and that's what we have to be on the look-out for. Since one key suppression tactic is slowing down the voting process, we have to be careful not to fall into that trap. Don't obstruct: just demand that whoever is giving you trouble step aside with you and let the voting continue.

But before we get into what you should do if things go wrong, here are a few pointers to help make sure your voting experience is a good one:

  • Find your polling place ahead of time. Having this information ahead of time will help make sure that you can zip to the polls and back during that half-hour lunch break. You can locate your local polling place using your zip code at http://www.mypollingplace.com. In most cases, the site will tell you what kind of voting machines to expect and how they work. (By the way, if www.mypollingplace.com conflicts with information you've received from your county or state election officials, use the official information.)

  • When in doubt, ASK. Poll workers are there to help you. They'll show you how to work the machines, and if you're at the wrong polling place, they should tell you how to get to the right one. Every polling place should also have a posted list of your voting rights, and instructions for filing a complaint if your rights have been violated.

  • Know your rights. If you're an eligible voter, you have the following rights:
    • If your name is not on the official voter list but you believe you are eligible to vote in that precinct, even if an election official challenges your vote, you have the right to cast a "provisional ballot."
    • If you're in line when the polls close, you should stay in line because you're entitled to vote.
    • In many states, your employer must allow you time to vote at some point during the day. You can't be fired for being late due to long polling lines.
    • You have the right to vote without being intimidated by anyone.
    • For your rights in your own state, check out this website.

  • Bring photo ID, preferably government-issued ID or a utility bill, phone bill, or paycheck with your name and current street address. If you're a new registrant, it may be required.

  • Vote in the morning. In a great majority of polling places, everything will go smoothly, but by going early you can help prevent lines later in the day.

  • A regular ballot is better than a provisional ballot. If your eligibility to vote is questioned, ask if you can cast a regular ballot by providing additional ID or by going to another polling place. Only cast a provisional ballot if there's no alternative available.

So, what if something does go wrong?

First, document it. If there are specific individuals involved who are challenging your right to vote, intimidating voters, or interfering with the process, try to get their names. Write down exactly what happened, including the time of day, descriptions of the people involved, and any other details you can remember.

Then, report it. There are lots of organizations that will be working to respond quickly to complaints of voter intimidation, suppression, and fraud. Here's who to call:

  • Common Cause: Call 1-866-MYVOTE1. Common Cause has set up a hotline that you can call to report any problems you have voting. They'll document where problems are occuring, watch for wide-spread voter suppression, and provide real-time legal help to the hot spots.

  • 1-866-OUR-VOTE. This hotline has been set up by a coalition of nonpartisan groups to deal with the most serious problems on election day. They have hundreds of lawyers standing by to immediately respond to the most egregious problems. 1-866-OUR-VOTE is the "911" of voter suppression hotlines. Please don't call unless your problem is serious enough that you have to talk to a lawyer immediately.

  • MoveOn PAC: Go to http://www.moveonpac.org. On election day, we'll have a form where you can post any problems you encounter and get help.

Again, to download a wallet-sized card with all of this information that you can bring with you to the polls, go to: http://cdn.moveonpac.org/content/pdfs/ep_card.pdf.

As Bill Clinton said at a rally with John Kerry on Monday, "They're trying to scare the voters away from the polls. It worked so well in Florida, they seem to be trying it elsewhere." We're not going to let them get away with it. And with your help, we'll make sure that anyone who tries to stop people from exercising their right to vote ends up behind bars.

Thanks for everything,

-- Adam, Eli, Hannah, James, Laura, and the whole MoveOn PAC Team
   October 27th, 2004

Learn this. Bring the materials with you. The future of our country is at stake.

[ Link to today's entries ]

  Thursday, October 28, 2004
 
Scientists estimate 100,000 Iraqi deaths.   That's some "liberation" ... From the AP:

A survey of deaths in Iraqi households estimates that as many as 100,000 more people may have died throughout the country in the 18 months after the U.S. invasion than would be expected based on the death rate before the war.

There is no official figure for the number of Iraqis killed since the conflict began, but some non-governmental estimates range from 10,000 to 30,000. As of Wednesday, 1,081 U.S. servicemen had been killed, according to the U.S. Defense Department.

The scientists who wrote the report concede that the data they based their projections on were of "limited precision," because the quality of the information depends on the accuracy of the household interviews used for the study. The interviewers were Iraqi, most of them doctors.

Designed and conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, Columbia University and the Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, the study is being published Thursday on the Web site of The Lancet medical journal.

The survey indicated violence accounted for most of the extra deaths seen since the invasion, and air strikes from coalition forces caused most of the violent deaths, the researchers wrote in the British-based journal.

"Most individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and children," they said.

But hey, freedom's on the march! Submitted by Steve, who said, "Even if these numbers aren't exact, whatever the growing total is, it's unacceptable and tragic."

Quote of the day.   Peace is our profession.

Mr. President, I didn't say we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do say no more than ten to twenty million, killed. Tops. Uh, depending on the breaks.

-- Gen. Buck Turgidson, "Dr. Strangelove; or, How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb"

Giuliani blames our troops for al Qa Qaa looting.   I'm agog with astonishment over this (Windows Media link).

The president was cautious, the president was prudent, the president did what a commander in chief should do. No matter how you try to blame it on the president the actual responsibility for it really would be for the troops that were there. Did they search carefully enough? Didn't they search carefully enough?
No, because their fucking orders were to rush to Baghdad to secure the oil ministry and look for nonexistent WMDs. Don't blame the troops for carrying out their superiors' incompetent orders.

Giuliani finally returns to being the complete fuckhead he was up through September 10, 2001.

And the response, from future Kerry administration cabinet official Wesley Clark:

For President Bush to send Rudolph Giuliani out on television to say that the "actual responsibility" for the failure to secure explosives lies with the troops is insulting and cowardly.

The President approved the mission and the priorities. Civilian leaders tell military leaders what to do. The military follows those orders and gets the job done. This was a failure of civilian leadership, first in not telling the troops to secure explosives and other dangerous materials, and second for not providing sufficient troops and sufficient equipment for troops to do the job.

President Bush sent our troops to war without sufficient body armor, without a sound plan and without sufficient forces to accomplish the mission. Our troops are performing a difficult mission with skill, bravery and determination. They deserve a commander in chief who supports them and understands that the buck stops in the Oval Office, not one who gets weak knees and shifts blame for his mistakes.

Way to court the military and military family vote, Shrubster.

Bush ghostwriter says Iraq attack planned two years before 9/11.   We've been saying this all along, those of us in the reality-based community who paid attention to the plans of all the Bush cronies in the Project for a New American Century, but here's someone who's saying he heard it from the horse's mouth ... [boldface emphases mine]

Two years before the September 11 attacks, presidential candidate George W. Bush was already talking privately about the political benefits of attacking Iraq, according to his former ghost writer, who held many conversations with then-Texas Governor Bush in preparation for a planned autobiography.

"He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999," said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. "It was on his mind. He said to me: 'One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.' And he said, 'My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.' He said, 'If I have a chance to invadeˇ.if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency." Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father's shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. "Suddenly, he's at 91 percent in the polls, and he'd barely crawled out of the bunker."

That President Bush and his advisers had Iraq on their minds long before weapons inspectors had finished their work -- and long before alleged Iraqi ties with terrorists became a central rationale for war -- has been raised elsewhere, including in a book based on recollections of former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill. However, Herskowitz was in a unique position to hear Bush's unguarded and unfiltered views on Iraq, war and other matters -- well before he became president.

In 1999, Herskowitz struck a deal with the campaign of George W. Bush about a ghost-written autobiography, which was ultimately titled A Charge to Keep: My Journey to the White House, and he and Bush signed a contract in which the two would split the proceeds. The publisher was William Morrow. Herskowitz was given unimpeded access to Bush, and the two met approximately 20 times so Bush could share his thoughts. Herskowitz began working on the book in May, 1999, and says that within two months he had completed and submitted some 10 chapters, with a remaining 4-6 chapters still on his computer. Herskowitz was replaced as Bush's ghostwriter after Bush's handlers concluded that the candidate's views and life experiences were not being cast in a sufficiently positive light.

According to Herskowitz ... Bush and his advisers were sold on the idea that it was difficult for a president to accomplish an electoral agenda without the record-high approval numbers that accompany successful if modest wars.

The revelations on Bush's attitude toward Iraq emerged recently during two taped interviews of Herskowitz, which included a discussion of a variety of matters, including his continued closeness with the Bush family, indicated by his subsequent selection to pen an authorized biography of Bush's grandfather, written and published last year with the assistance and blessing of the Bush family.

Herskowitz also revealed the following:

  • In 2003, Bush's father indicated to him that he disagreed with his son's invasion of Iraq.

  • Bush admitted that he failed to fulfill his Vietnam-era domestic National Guard service obligation, but claimed that he had been "excused."

  • Bush revealed that after he left his Texas National Guard unit in 1972 under murky circumstances, he never piloted a plane again. That casts doubt on the carefully-choreographed moment of Bush emerging in pilot's garb from a jet on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln in 2003 to celebrate "Mission Accomplished" in Iraq. The image, instantly telegraphed around the globe, and subsequent hazy White House statements about his capacity in the cockpit, created the impression that a heroic Bush had played a role in landing the craft.

  • Bush described his own business ventures as "floundering" before campaign officials insisted on recasting them in a positive light.
Several people who know Herskowitz well addressed his character and the veracity of his recollections. "I don't know anybody that's ever said a bad word about Mickey," said Barry Silverman, a well-known Houston executive and civic figure who worked with him on another book project. An informal survey of Texas journalists turned up uniform confidence that Herskowitz's account as contained in this article could be considered accurate.

One noted Texas journalist who spoke with Herskowitz about the book in 1999 recalls how the author mentioned to him at the time that Bush had revealed things the campaign found embarrassing and did not want in print. He requested anonymity because of the political climate in the state. "I can't go near this," he said.

According to Herskowitz, George W. Bush's beliefs on Iraq were based in part on a notion dating back to the Reagan White House -- ascribed in part to now-vice president Dick Cheney, Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee under Reagan. "Start a small war. Pick a country where there is justification you can jump on, go ahead and invade."

This entire article is a must-read.

Cost of war now stratospheric.   It galls me to recall the post-debate attacks on John Kerry for saying that the war would cost $200 billion. Turns out the Republicans were right. Kerry was wrong. It's not going to cost $200 billion -- it's going to cost $225 billion. From The Daily Misleader:

Before the invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration told the American people that it could be fought on the cheap. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said "We are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon." Budget Director Mitch Daniels said Iraq will be "an affordable endeavor", one "that will not require sustained aid" and cost "in the range of $50 billion to $60 billion." Defense Policy Board Member Richard Perle said, "Iraq is a very wealthy country... They can finance, largely finance, the reconstruction of their own country." They were all wrong.

The Washington Post reports "the Bush administration intends to seek about $70 billion in emergency funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan early next year, pushing total war costs close to $225 billion since the invasion of Iraq early last year."

They've even failed to carry out their own obsessive, needless war in a successful manner. They ignored the realities of what it would cost in lives and dollars, and continue to ignore that reality, and their obsession with non-existent weapons of mass destruction caused them to over look hundreds of thousands of pounds of powerful "conventional" explosives that are now killing dozens and dozens of our troops every month.

They keep saying they have no evidence that John Kerry could protect us better or run the war better than they could. For God's sake, a child could do it better than this. It'd be pretty goddamned difficult to do a worse job.

Get rid of them. On November 2, vote John Kerry for president.

[ Link to today's entries ]

  Wednesday, October 27, 2004
 
Quotes of the day.   In response to today's remarks by the president:

Today George W. Bush made a very compelling and thoughtful argument for why he should not be reelected. In his own words, he told the American people that "...a political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not a person you want as your Commander in Chief."

President Bush couldn't be more right. He jumped to conclusions about any connection between Saddam Hussein and 9/11. He jumped to conclusions about weapons of mass destruction. He jumped to conclusions about the mission being accomplished. He jumped to conclusions about how we had enough troops on the ground to win the peace. And because he jumped to conclusions, terrorists and insurgents in Iraq may very well have their hands on powerful explosives to attack our troops, we are stuck in Iraq without a plan to win the peace, and Americans are less safe both at home and abroad." By doing all these things, he broke faith with our men and women in uniform. He has let them down. George W. Bush is unfit to be our Commander in Chief.

-- Gen. Wesley Clark, October 27, 2004

In response to the president's comments on the missing explosives:

The President failed to adequately plan to secure the tons of explosives, munitions and weapons in Iraq and ignored the military commanders who told him he'd need more troops to both secure these explosives, take Baghdad and win the peace.

The American people deserve answers. The troops deserve answers. Their families deserve answers.

This is the same President who sent our troops in to battle without the body armor and without armored Humvees.

We have the best trained, best fighters in the world. They need a new commander-in- chief who understand that the buck stops in the Oval Office and knows the meaning of responsibilities he has to our troops. This President has failed that test repeatedly.

The President seems to think Senator Kerry could not possibly be criticizing him since the President thinks he has never made a mistake. Let's be perfectly clear: it is the President who dropped the ball. Senator Kerry is being critical of George Bush, not the troops. By embarking on the line of attack, George Bush is deflecting blame from him over to the military. This is beneath contempt.

-- Gen. Merrill A. McPeak (ret.), former U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff, October 27, 2004

Is this America?   Two stories of intimidation of high school students, in the country George W. Bush calls America. Lemme tell ya ... it ain't America, unless I woke up this morning in a country where there's no freedom of speech.

First, from The Progressive, via Right Hand Thief:

John Sachs is a high school senior in Johnston, Iowa, a northern suburb of Des Moines. Sachs got a ticket at school to go see Bush speak in nearby Clive one day in early October. It was billed as a question and answer session with the President.

So he and two friends, Alex Grasso and Tim Stewart, went to the event.

"I was wearing this pin that said 'Bush-Cheney '04: Leave No Billionaire Behind,' and we were walking in the line going up to the metal detector, and one of the Bush staffers saw my pin and literally pulled me out of the line," Sachs says. "He said, 'Come with me. Let me see that pin.'

"So I pulled my shirt toward him so he could read it.

"He read it and said, 'Give me the pin.'

"So I took it off and gave it to him."

Sachs says the Bush staffer told him he could go back in line. But then the staffer pulled him aside again.

"Are you a Bush supporter?"

"Well, not really."

"So why are you here?"

"I'm here to see my President, and ask questions of my President."

Then the staffer gave Sachs a chilling warning, he says. According to Sachs, here's what the Bush staffer said: "Know if you protest that it won't be me taking you out. It will be a sniper."

[more]

Next, yesterday in Wisconsin, via Kos [although as it turns out the claim of threats of expulsion is apparently untrue; see update below]:

[An email from Wisconsin:] A friend with a child in the Richland County, WI high school where George Bush appears today reports the following. Students were told they could not wear any pro-Kerry clothing or buttons or protest in any manner, at the risk of expulsion. After a parent inquired, an alternative activity will be provided, probably a movie being shown in an auditorium. (The school secretary reportedly said that students had the choice of just staying home if they didn't want to attend the Bush rally, but the principal subsequently offered an alternative.)
Kos continues, "If Bush comes to a high school, how dare his campaign dictate what students can wear?

"This is out of control.

Patrick adds, "Expulsion means you're tossed out of public school for the rest of the year. For wearing a button supporting the Democratic nominee for President.

"Still think it's extreme to call these people fascists?

UPDATE: Mary's got the skinny from Richland High School Principal John Cler, who said:

"Here's what happened. The Bush campaign called to ask if they could rent our gym. We are a rural town, with the only space large enough. We thought it would be a great opportunity for our kids to hear him, as I said to them 'whether you agree with him or not.' THe Bush people gave out tickets [I think maybe the tickets cost something and they gave some to the kids for free? In any event, in addition to the rental fee, they also got tickets for interested students.] including some for the students, and the Bush people made the rules about the kids not being allowed to wear Kerry gear, which is typcial for Bush events. We and they never ever mentioned the word expulsion. We told the kids that if the Bush campaign had a problem with them, they would remove them from the gym. It was a separate event from school. I wanted to do it in part so the kids could see the political process up close, and have a chance to see the President. They made their folks available to come to classrooms to talk to the kids, so for a small town, this is a great opportunity. We did NOT threaten explosion -- that would be illegal, and I wouldn't allow it anyway."
This exonerates the principal from the charges that he threatened to expel dissenters, but he still failed his students by allowing a rally to take place on his campus while freedom of speech was being abridged. It also is yet another appalling move by the Bush campaign, who still won't tolerate any dissent against their Four Year Plan. What a terrible message to send to the kids, who learned in their civics classes that our Constitution enshrines their freedom of speech.

The rise of pseudo fascism.   David Neiwert continues his remarkable series of arcicles at his website, Orcinus. There was a new article posted yesterday; the series will conclude next week. Start reading now.

The Rise of Pseudo Fascism

Part 1: The Morphing of the Conservative Movement
Part 2: The Architecture of Fascism
Part 3: The Pseudo-Fascist Campaign
Part 4: The Apocalyptic One-Party State
Part 5: Warfare By Other Means
Part 6: Breaking Down the Barriers

It's not light reading, but it's essential reading, particularly if you really want to know how much your vote for Kerry will be worth next week.

A lifetime supply!   Via Cursor: "A Knight Ridder news report on the weapon of choice for Iraq insurgents -- homemade bombs, or improvised explosive devices' -- quotes an Iraqi police official as saying that 'the terrorists took all the explosives they would ever need' when the coalition failed to guard ammunition depots."

The New Orleans election scene: "Sitting it out is not an option."   Louisiana has been pretty solidly in the Bush camp as a whole, and is expected to go red next Tuesday. However, there's a big groundswell of support for Kerry in the Crescent City, and not only because the city's majority black population tend not to be Bush's demographic. In the aftermath of the New Orleans Times-Picayune's failure to endorse a candidate last Sunday, one reader responds in a letter to the editor:

Cowards!

I am outraged that the editors of The Times-Picayune chose to remain neutral in endorsing neither George W. Bush nor John Kerry for president.

In an election year that is expected to have a record voter turnout and with all the efforts nationwide to encourage citizens to vote, my hometown newspaper decides to sit it out. The attitude reflected in your editorial is akin to that of the voter who stays home on election day because he can't decide who to vote for, so he doesn't vote at all.

After rereading your gutless editorial, I am convinced that the real reason behind your "too many misgivings about both candidates to champion either one" is the editors' fear of alienating their fat-cat friends and advertisers by endorsing John Kerry, or admitting that a second Bush term would be the death knell of America.

Reread the first paragraph of your spineless editorial and tell me you can't "champion either one."

I am a white, Catholic, Republican, suburban woman who is voting for John Kerry. To echo the words of The Lone Star Iconoclast, hometown newspaper of George W. Bush, which endorsed him in 2000: "The re-election of George W. Bush would be a mandate to continue on our present course of chaos... That's why The Iconoclast urges Texans not to rate the candidate by his hometown or even his political party, but instead by where he intends to take the country. The Iconoclast wholeheartedly endorses John Kerry."

Whether Kerry or Bush, I expected no less from The Times-Picayune.

Kathy J. Higgins
Metairie

In case you didn't know, Metairie is a very conservative suburb of New Orleans, parts of which sent David Duke to the Louisiana legislature in 1989. I'd be surprised if Mrs. Higgins was alone in this. (You go, Kathy!)

New Orleans weblog Right Hand Thief comments:

Da Paper is too disappointed in Bush to endorse him. (Read: the publisher told the T-P editors to choose Bush and they threw a big enough fit so that a non-endorsement was the compromise. A spouse of one of the opinion page editors informed me that the paper's owner/publisher decides all of the major endorsements -- not an uncommon practice. He's conservative and I'm sure he sees a substantial qualitative difference between Kerry and Dubya. Oh, to have been a fly on the wall during that conference call...)
Yeah you rite.

One more for Big John.   The Orlando Sentinel was a big one. However, to what would have been astonishment if not for the realization that no one who lives in a reality-based world and truly understands the situation we're in could possibly vote for Bush, The Idaho Statesman, a staunchly conservative newspaper in America's most staunchly conservative state, endorses John Kerry.

And yet another: "Bush Relatives for Kerry".   Yep, it's for real -- these folks' blood is blue-state blue.

"Bush Relatives for Kerry" grew out of a series of conversations that took place between a group of people that have two things in common: they are all related to George Walker Bush, and they are all voting for John Kerry. As the election approaches, we feel it is our responsibility to speak out about why we are voting for John Kerry, and to do our small part to help America heal from the sickness it has suffered since George Bush was appointed President in 2000. We invite you to read our stories, and please, don't vote for our cousin!
I don't think y'all'll have to worry too much. (I'm feeling better every day.)

[ Link to today's entries ]

  Tuesday, October 26, 2004
 
It's out! Buy one! Buy several! Makes great gifts!   Today is the official release day for Doctors, Professors, Kings and Queens: The Big Ol' Box of New Orleans -- five hours, thirteen minutes of music, 84 pages of writing and photos, the product of a lot of my sweat, passion, anguish, joy and lots and lots of late nights and long weekends for the last year-and-two-months. In case you missed it earlier, here's the track listing.

Da Box Set!
It was a rocky road sometimes, but at the end I have to say that I'm really thrilled with the project, and I really, really hope y'all enjoy it.


Lots and lots of people to thank here: my dear friend Mary Herczog, who wrote the wonderful New Orleans travel portions of the book (and whose name got left off the credits); my dear friend Steve Hochman (Mary's hubby), for suggesting to the project's exec producer that it might be a good idea to hire me to do it; aforementioned exec producer Gary Stewart for his faith, inspiration, arguments and constant support; Shawn Amos and Derek Dressler and all the folks at S